Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co. & Affiliates v. Miller

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 25, 1999No. C6-97-2070PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANCASTER, J.

This case raises the issue of whether Metropolitan Property and Casualty Company has a duty to defend and indemnify its in-

sured, Jennifer Miller, under a homeowner’s policy for fading to warn or prevent the sexual abuse committed by Michael Miller, her husband, against B.M.F., an 11-year-old girl. The district court concluded on summary judgment that Metropolitan had no duty to defend and indemnify, finding no coverage for any of the claims against Jennifer Miller or Michael Miller. B.M.F. appealed the coverage determination as it applied to Jennifer Müler, and a divided…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Miller v. ShugartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Iowa Kemper Insurance Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. Columbia Heights Motors, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. Brown v. State Automobile & Casualty UnderwritersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Thommes v. Milwaukee Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  2. General Casualty Co. of Wisconsin v. Wozniak Travel, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  3. American Commerce Insurance v. PortoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
  4. In Re: Airline Ticket Commission Antitrust Litigation. Travel Network, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  5. Kersten v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API