Paganini v. Polostrini
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. James M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an appeal from an order of the trial court granting a motion for nonsuit.
The plaintiff, a married woman living with her husband, brings this action to recover the reasonable value of certain necessaries of life furnished a minor while not under the care of his parents or guardian, and while said minor was living in the home of the plaintiff and her husband, and was being supplied with such necesaries out of their community property. There is no averment or proof that the plaintiff rendered to the minor any special service, or expended upon him any money form her own separate…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tingley v. Times Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Baldwin v. Second Street Cable RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Duncan v. DuncanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Schwarze v. MahoneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by4 opinions
- Echord v. RushSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
- Flit de Vázquez v. White Star Bus Line, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1936
- Bull v. Chicago, M. & St. Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1925
- Flit de Vázquez v. White Star Bus Line, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1936