Legal Opinion

Mieras v. DeBona

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 2, 1994No. Docket 142498PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarilyn Kelly, J.

Plaintiffs appeal as of right from an order of summary disposition in favor of defendant in this attorney negligence action. They argue on appeal that, as intended beneficiaries of their mother’s will, they are entitled to pursue a negligence claim against, defendant, the attorney who drafted the will. They argue that they should recover damages for emotional distress and costs incurred in prior probate court proceedings in which the will was contested. We reverse in part, affirm in part and remand for further proceedings.

i

Ruth Ann Mieras and Elmer E. Ledbetter sued alleging that in August,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Moning v. AlfonoMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Friedman v. DozorcMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Williams v. PolgarMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. AllenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Atlanta International Insurance v. BellMichigan Supreme Court · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Department of Economic Development v. Arthur Andersen & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  2. Mieras v. DeBonaMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Hart v. Comerica BankDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
  4. McClain v. University of Michigan Board of RegentsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Grupo Condumex, S.A. De C v. v. SPX Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API