Northwest Environmental Advocates v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ACOSTA, United States Magistrate Judge:
Plaintiff challenges decisions made by federal agencies related to the State of Oregon’s water quality standards. Plaintiff has filed two Motions for Partial Summary Judgment [207 and 212] and defendants have filed Cross-Motions for Partial Summary Judgment [254 and 260]. These motions request summary judgment on all claims in plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint. For the following reasons, plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the Endangered Species Act claims [207] is granted, plaintiffs Motion *1204for Partial Summary Judgment…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Alabama Power Company v. Douglas M. Costle, as Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, Sierra Club, Intervenors.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Natural Resources Defense Council v. McCarthyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Oregon Wild v. U.S. Forest ServiceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2016
- Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project v. JeffriesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2022
- Buffalo River Watershed Alliance v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2024
- Northwest Environmental Advocates v. United State National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)District Court, D. Oregon · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.