Legal Opinion
Oregon Wild v. U.S. Forest Service
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided June 17, 2016No. Case No. 1:15-cv-00895-CLPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MARK D. CLARKE, United States Magistrate Judge
Plaintiffs are non-profit environmental organizations. They assert Defendants’ continued authorization of livestock grazing on allotments on and near the Sycan River is arbitrary; capricious; and contrary to the Endangered Species Act (ESA), the Clean Water Act (CWA), the National Forest Management Act (NFMA), and the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (WSRA). Defendant-Intervenors are ranchers permitted to graze cattle on the at-issue land.
Pending before the Court are four motions. Plaintiffs, Defendants, and the Withers Ranch Intervenors move (#45,…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness AllianceSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cent. Sierra Envtl. Res. Ctr. v. Stanislaus Nat'l ForestDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
- Oregon Wild v. Constance CumminsDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2017
- Friends of the River v. Nat'l Marine Fisheries Serv.District Court, E.D. California · 2018