Natural Resources Defense Council v. McCarthy
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
Re: ECF No. 38
JON S. TIGAR, United States District Judge
Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ complaint. The Court will deny the motion.
1. BACKGROUND
A. Factual History1
This case concerns actions taken by the State of California following Governor Edmund G. Brown, Jr.’s January 17, 2014, Proclamation of a “State of Emergency” throughout California due to severe drought conditions. ECF No. 1-1 at 5.2 In particular, the case focuses on the waters subject to the 1995 San Francisco Bay/Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Estuary Water…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Citizens for Pennsylvania's Future v. ReganDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
- Klamath Tribes v. United States Bureau of ReclamationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024
- Klamath Tribes v. United States Bureau of ReclamationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024