Legal Opinion
Los Angeles Police Protective League v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 26, 1985No. Civ. 67757PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HARRIS, J. *
*This appeal is from a judgment denying mandate to compel the City of Los Angeles to meet and confer with regard to its unilateral institution of parking fees for 76 City employees assigned to work in a city-leased building in downtown Los Angeles, and also denying attorneys’ fees against the city pursuant to section 1021.5, Code of Civil Procedure, and section 800 of the Government Code.
The question presented is whether the determination that the parking fees were not too trivial to trigger the meet and confer obligation, made by the employee relations board (ERB) created…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ford Motor Co. (Chicago Stamping Plant) v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Woodland Hills Residents Ass'n v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Baggett v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Glendale City Employees' Ass'n v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Taylor v. CraneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Los Angeles Police Protective League v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Leslie's Pool Mart, Inc. v. Department of Food & AgricultureCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Gustafson v. ZolinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997