Legal Opinion
Gilroy Citizens for Responsible Planning v. City of Gilroy
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 22, 2006No. H028539PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PREMO, Acting P. J.
Plaintiffs Gilroy Citizens for Responsible Planning, Steve Jones, Carmen Soto, and Lenny Ortega (hereafter, collectively, Citizens), 1 opposed to the construction of a Wal-Mart Supercenter (Supercenter) in the Pacheco Pass Shopping Center in Gilroy, appeal the denial of their petition for a writ of mandate to set aside defendant City of Gilroy (City)’s certification of an environmental impact report (EIR) and approval of the Supercenter. They assert that City violated the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) 2 by failing to comply with procedural requirements…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. City of BakersfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Gentry v. City of MurrietaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Neighbors for Smart Rail v. Exposition Metro Line Construction AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- Eureka Citizens for Responsible Government v. City of EurekaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- North Coast Rivers Alliance v. Marin Municipal Water District Board of DirectorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Mani Bros. Real Estate Group v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Cherry Valley Pass Acres & Neighbors v. City of BeaumontCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.