Legal Opinion
unempl.ins.rep. Cch 21,877 United States of America v. Danielle Facchini
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 19, 1987No. 86-3094, 86-3097-86-3102, 86-3104-86-3111, 86-3117, 86-3118, 86-3121-86-3123, 86-3127, 86-3128, 86-3137-86-3140, 86-3148, 86-3154, 86-3161 and 86-3177PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:
These consolidated appeals require that we determine whether 18 U.S.C. § 10011 extends to false statements made to a state unemployment insurance program certified and supported by the federal Department of Labor pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 501 et seq. and 26 U.S.C. § 3304. Ms. Facchini and the other appellants appeal their convictions under 18 U.S.C. § 1001 for making false statements to the Oregon Division of Employment. They argue that their statements to the state department were not matters “within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. GillilandSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Bryson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. John B. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Luz Elena Valdez, United States of America v. Maria Guadalupe Lomeli-LomeliCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Alfredo Equihua-Juarez, AKA Jorge Perez-Magana, Martin Ramirez-EstradaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. FacchiniCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Gerardo Rodriguez-Rodriguez, Rosa Maria RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Oliver KingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.