United States v. Alfredo Equihua-Juarez, AKA Jorge Perez-Magana, Martin Ramirez-Estrada
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:
Alfredo Equihua-Juarez appeals his conviction, following a jury trial, for making a false material statement to a United States Border Patrol agent in violation of 18 U.S. C. § 1001. 1 Equihua-Juarez made the false statement when he gave a false name, i.e., “Martin Ramirez-Estrada,” in response to a question asked by Border Patrol Agent Spruance during a postarrest interview. Equihua-Juarez contends that his false statement falls within the “exculpatory no” exception to section 1001. Specifically, Equihua-Juarez argues that stating his true name would have potentially…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Donald Gene BoothCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Brogan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. Arturo Gonzalez-SandovalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Jerry A. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Salvador Parra, Also Known as Salvador Ledezma, United States of America v. Jose Alfredo Sotelo, Also Known as Ricardo DuarteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Rodriguez-RiosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.