Legal Opinion

United States v. Facchini

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 9, 1989No. Nos. 86-3094, 86-3097 to 86-3099, 86-3101, 86-3102, 86-3104 to 86-3111, 86-3117, 86-3118, 86-3121, 86-3123, 86-3128, 86-3137 to 86-3140, 86-3148, 86-3122, 86-3154, 86-3161, 86-3177 and 86-3100PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:

Ms. Facchini and the other appellants were convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (1982), which prohibits a person from making materially false statements in a matter within the jurisdiction of a federal department or agency. We took this case en banc to determine whether the extent of federal involvement in a state unemployment insurance program justifies imposing federal criminal liability under section 1001 on claimants who made misrepresentations on applications for state unemployment benefits. We must also determine whether *640other claimants who received federal…

2Cases cited14 opinions

United States v. GillilandSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
Bryson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
United States v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
United States v. Bobbie Stanford, Louis Watson, Janice Davis, Estella Patterson, Doris Beverly, Dorothy Fife, Richard O'rourke, and Dorothy JonesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
United States v. John B. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

United States v. Jeffrey Jay RutgardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
United States v. Mary Rose Oakar and Joseph DemioCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
United States v. Ravneet SinghCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
United States v. Jerry OrenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant(98-6609/6633)/cross-Appellee v. John David WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.