Clackamas Gastroenterology Associates, P. C. v. Wells
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens
The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA or Act), 104 Stat. 327, as amended, 42 U. S. C. § 12101 et seq., like other federal antidiscrimination legislation,1 is inapplicable to very small businesses. Under the ADA an “em*442ployer” is not covered unless its work force includes “15 or more employees for each working day in each of 20 or more calendar weeks in the current or preceding calendar year.” § 12111(5). The question in this case is whether four physicians actively engaged in medical practice as shareholders and directors of a professional corporation should be counted as…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Community for Creative Non-Violence v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by298 opinions
- Barton v. ClancyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Stewart J. Rodal v. Anesthesia Group of Onondaga, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Sister Michael Marie v. American Red CrossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Raymond B. Yates, MD, PC Profit Sharing Plan v. HendonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Butler v. Drive Automotive Industries of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
293 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.