Legal Opinion

LKL Associates, Inc. v. Farley

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 2004No. 20020626PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILKINS, Associate Chief Justice:

¶ 1 CraCar Construction Company (“Cra-Car”), a third-party defendant, appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to a number of condominium owners who were defendants in an action brought by LKL Associates, Inc. (“LKL”) to foreclose mechanic’s liens against the individual condominiums. CraCar argues that the trial court incorrectly applied Utah Code sections 38-11-102(20) and -107(1) (2001), which prohibit the filing of certain mechanic’s liens on “residences,” as defined therein. We reverse and remand.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶ 2 The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Prince, Yeates & Geldzahler v. YoungUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Bearden v. CroftUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  3. American Fork City v. Pena-FloresUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Dick Simon Trucking, Inc. v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Labelle v. McKay Dee Hospital CenterUtah Supreme Court · 2004

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Penunuri v. Sundance Partners, Ltd.Utah Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. RothlisbergerUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. OutzenUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Due South, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  5. John Holmes Construction, Inc. v. R.A. McKell Excavating, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API