Legal Opinion

American Fork City v. Pena-Flores

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 2002No. 20010056PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*677RUSSON, Justice:

¶ 1 Luis Pena-Flores (“Pena-Flores”) was convicted in October 1999 of interfering with a peace officer seeking to effect a lawful arrest or detention, a class B misdemeanor in violation of Utah Code Ann. § 76-8-305 (1999). His conviction was affirmed by the court of appeals in American Fork City v. Penar-Flores, 2000 UT App 323, 14 P.3d 698. On certiorari to this court, Pena-Flores reasserts his claim that his conviction should be overturned because the detention with which he interfered was not lawful. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 The facts and procedural history are not in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Brandenburg v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. People v. CurtisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Bailey v. BaylesUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. DoeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. CrawleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
  2. Provo City Corp. v. ThompsonUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. CollinsUtah Supreme Court · 2014
  4. LKL Associates, Inc. v. FarleyUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Layton City v. StevensonUtah Supreme Court · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API