Legal Opinion
Prince, Yeates & Geldzahler v. Young
Utah Supreme Court
Decided March 30, 2004No. 20020347PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILKINS, Justice:
¶ 1 Plaintiff Prince, Yeates & Geldzahler (“Prince Yeates” or “the firm”) appeals the district court’s denial of the firm’s motion for summary judgment on defendant Robert S. Young’s counterclaim for breach of express contract and its grant of partial summary judgment to Young on the firm’s breach of fiduciary duty claim. We reverse.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶2 In April 1995, Prince Yeates hired Young as an associate attorney. Previously, Young had spent the majority of his twelve-year legal career as general counsel for Rocky Mountain Helicopters, where he acquired…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Resource Management Co. v. Weston RanchUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Vendo Company v. StonerIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
- Freedman v. PearlmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Richard Barton Enterprises, Inc. v. TsernUtah Supreme Court · 1996
- Microbiological Research Corp. v. MunaUtah Supreme Court · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Law Offices of Ronald J. Palagi v. HowardNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
- Normandeau v. Hanson Equipment, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2009
- Jones v. MacKey Price Thompson & OstlerUtah Supreme Court · 2015
- CDC Restoration & Construction, LC v. Tradesmen Contractors, LLCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
- McKenzie v. Allconnect, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2019
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.