Legal Opinion

Due South, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 2008No. 20060971PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARRISH, Justice:

INTRODUCTION

{1 Following two incidents in 2002, the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (the "DABC") found Due South, Inc. ("Due South") liable for three statutory violations of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act. Due South appeals. Challenging, among other issues, the definition of "intoxication" as applied to Utah Code section 32A-12-216 (2001) by the DABC Commission (the "Com mission") and later by the district court in a trial de novo. The DABC cross-appeals, arguing that the district court wrongly conducted a trial de novo rather than reviewing the record created by…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Scharf v. BMG Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Clover v. Snowbird Ski ResortUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Society of Separationists, Inc. v. WhiteheadUtah Supreme Court · 1993

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gressman v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Rawlings v. RawlingsUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Donahue v. WihongiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
  4. Salt Lake County v. Holliday Water Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Harvey v. Cedar Hills CityUtah Supreme Court · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API