Legal Opinion

Bd. of Education of City of Asbury Park v. Hoek

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 29, 1962PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Schettino, J.

Plaintiff instituted this action to recover profits on certain “cost plus” contracts, awarded without public bidding, for work performed in Asbury Park schools from September 25, 1952 through September 25, 1958. Defendant Hoek was plaintiff’s secretary-business manager during the period in question and defendant Matthews is a carpenter-contractor who performed work under the contracts.

The pretrial order did not serve to crystallize the issues. With the aid of the complaint, however, it seems clear that plaintiff sought recovery from…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Lynch v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Shelton Hotel Co., Inc. v. BatesWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Fife v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. Alexander v. PhillipsArizona Supreme Court · 1927
  5. In Re Savannah Special Consolidated School DistrictMississippi Supreme Court · 1950

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. State, Dept. of Environ. Protect. v. Ventron Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  2. Banco Popular North America v. GandiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  3. Renz v. Penn Central Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  4. Malaker Corp. Stockholders Protective Committee v. First Jersey National BankNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  5. Eli Lilly and Co. v. Roussel Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API