Legal Opinion
Luman v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided June 8, 1981No. F-78-624, F-78-625PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CORNISH, Judge:
The appellants, James Haskell Luman and Kenneth Eugene Luman, were convicted of Unlawful Cultivation of Marijuana and Unlawful Possession of Marijuana With Intent To Distribute in the District Court of LeFlore County.
Sheriff Kirkland, of LeFlore County, received an anonymous telephone call stating that a substance believed to be marijuana, surrounded by a cornfield, was growing on the Luman place. On September 3, 1977, the sheriff and his deputy drove to the farm. Approximately three hundred feet away from the cornfield, the sheriff observed what he believed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Hester v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Orval Care v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- Hunsucker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1970
- Stevens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
3Cited by21 opinions
- Arnett v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. CadaIdaho Court of Appeals · 1996
- Beeler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1984
- Brown v. City of Oklahoma CityCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1986
- Teeman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.