Legal Opinion

Brown v. City of Oklahoma City

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided February 4, 1986No. 61122PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1348BRIGHTMIRE, Presiding Judge.

The determinative questions for resolution are these: (1) was the warrantless search of plaintiffs residential premises and seizure of her automobile unreasonable and therefore illegal? And, if so, (2) did plaintiff have a right to resist the wrongful seizure and ensuing arrest with reasonable force?

We answer both questions affirmatively and reverse the summary judgment rendered below.

I

The operative facts are embodied in the following stipulation of the parties:

“1. That on March the 6th, 1979, Officers Englebretsen and Citty received a radiogram from the Oklahoma…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Silverman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. United States v. LefkowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Wright v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Graves v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  2. People v. HilgenbergAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  3. Haase v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  4. Riley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  5. State v. CoxNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API