Legal Opinion
Schober v. Mountain Bell Telephone
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided July 13, 1981No. 4383PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LOPEZ, Judge.
This suit is the result of plaintiff’s attempts to secure compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, §§ 52-1-1 to 52-1-69, N.M.S.A.1978. Plaintiff, formerly an engineer with Mountain Bell, collapsed at work, in November, 1976 and on January 24, 1977, allegedly as a result of his continued exposure to cigarette smoke in his work area. His recovery from the second collapse took four months, by which time he had lost his job.
The trial court awarded benefits for partial temporary disability. Plaintiff appeals, claiming 1) he has a total and permanent disability and 2)…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Medina v. Zia CompanyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
- Ross v. Sayers Well Servicing CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Anaya v. New Mexico Steel Erectors, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- Aranda v. Mississippi Chemical Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
- Lozano v. ArcherNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Hernandez v. Mead Foods, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
- Nosker v. Trinity Land Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
- Schwartzman v. Schwartzman Packing Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
- Berry v. MeadowsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
- Jaramillo v. Kaufman Plumbing & Heating Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.