Legal Opinion
Aranda v. Mississippi Chemical Corp.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided August 7, 1979No. 3686PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
Workmen’s compensation benefits were denied plaintiff and he appeals. We reverse.
The trial court made extensive findings. Reduced in length, the findings may first be partially summarized as follows:
Plaintiff, now 30 years of age with the equivalent of a high school education, plus some college level training and experience in welding, suffered a fractured ischium (a bone on which you sit) and a lumbosacral sprain. On July 2, 1976, he was crushed between a jeep and grease wagon while working underground as a mechanic on production.
From July 2, 1976 to October 12, 1976,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Vetter v. Alaska Workmen's Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Medina v. Zia CompanyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
- Marez v. Kerr-McGee Nuclear Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
- Allen v. Core Target City Youth ProgramCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Lane v. Levi Strauss & Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Coates v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- Bottijliso v. Hutchison Fruit Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
- Anaya v. New Mexico Steel Erectors, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- Schober v. Mountain Bell TelephoneNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
- Jeffrey v. Hays Plumbing & HeatingNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.