Jaramillo v. Kaufman Plumbing & Heating Co.
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALTERS, Justice.
We granted certiorari on this matter only to review the basis for the Court of Appeals’ decision regarding reimbursement of compensation paid after the workman’s disability has ended.
Repeal of a statute by implication is disfavored. We affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals but, with regard to reimbursement, we adopt Judge Bivins’s special concurrence.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FEDERICI, C.J., SOSA, Senior Justice, and RIORDAN and STOWERS, JJ., concur.
APPENDIX
Nos. 7996, 8003.
Court of Appeals of New Mexico.
July 16, 1985.
OPINION
DONNELLY, Chief Judge.
Both plaintiff and…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Garcia v. Genuine Parts Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
- Medina v. Zia CompanyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
- Vaughn v. United Nuclear Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
- Katz v. New Mexico Department of Human ServicesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
- Anaya v. New Mexico Steel Erectors, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. MunizNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
- Amos v. Gilbert Western Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
- Jojola v. Aetna Life & CasualtyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
- Barnett & Casbarian, Inc. v. OrtizNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
- Bower v. Western Fleet MaintenanceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.