Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Peters

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 5, 2007PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 12, 2006, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Claimant worked for an employment placement agency which assigned him to work as a painter for one of its clients. After *616working a 60-hour-per-week schedule for a short period of time, claimant requested to work a shift with fewer hours each week, in part because he was unhappy with the working conditions at his assigned location. Despite the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of LoggheAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. In re the Claim of PregonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. In re the Claim of WoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. In re the Claim of AriasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of StraderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. In re the Claim of KridelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. In re the Claim of BattisteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. In re the Claim of RuggieroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API