Legal Opinion

Robert Hines and Ruth C. Hines, His Wife v. Tenneco Chemicals, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 2, 1984No. 83-2126PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEE, Circuit Judge:

In 1943 Mrs. Hines, a North Carolina resident, underwent a diagnostic procedure requiring the injection of a radioactive dye into her system. Thirty-six years later she brought an action in the state courts of Texas, asserting that the dye had caused her personal injury. Removal brought her suit to federal district court, 546 F.Supp. 1229 (D.C.Tex.1982), where she suffered summary judgment on the basis of a North Carolina statute of repose. Concluding that the trial court was correct, we affirm its judgment.

The statute in question, North Carolina General Statute § l-15(b),…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gutierrez v. CollinsTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Lamb v. Wedgewood South Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. Ballenger v. CrowellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Hines v. Tenneco Chemicals, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mark Wayne v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  2. Crouch v. General Electric Co.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1988
  3. Williams v. Upjohn Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API