Legal Opinion

State v. Mallard

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 2001No. 1999-00003-SC-R11-CDPublishedCited by 109 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · BarkerBarker, J.

in which ANDERSON, C.J., and DROWOTA, BIRCH, and HOLDER, JJ., joined.

In this appeal, we address whether Tennessee Code Annotated section 39-17-424 (1997) requires admission into evidence of a defendant’s prior convictions relating to controlled substances, even when Tennessee Rule of Evidence 404(b) would otherwise render such evidence inadmissible. During the appellant’s trial in the Rutherford County Circuit Court for possession of drug paraphernalia, the State admitted evidence of the appellant’s prior convictions for possession of crack cocaine and drug paraphernalia under section…

3Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Momon v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. MixonTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. DuBoseTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. DuncanTennessee Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Morrow v. CorbinTexas Supreme Court · 1933

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by109 opinions

  1. Webb v. Nashville Area Habitat for Humanity, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. RossTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. RodriguezTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. StevensTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  5. People v. Watkins; People v. PullenMichigan Supreme Court · 2012

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API