Exxon Pipeline Co. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge HARRY T. EDWARDS.
Opinion concurring in the result filed by Circuit Judge J. SKELLY WRIGHT. HARRY T. EDWARDS, Circuit Judge:
This case requires us to consider again the proper scope of judicial review of decisions by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC” or “Commission”) concerning the reasons given to justify oil pipeline rate suspensions. On March 18, 1983, FERC issued an order suspending for seven months a proposed rate filed by Exxon Pipeline Company for the Trans Alaska Pipeline System (“TAPS”). A seven-month suspension is the maximum…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Dunlop v. BachowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Trans Alaska Pipeline Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Arrow Transportation Co. v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Papago Tribal Utility Authority v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Arizona Public Service Company and Arizona Power Authority, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Patrick Ellis v. Elaine L. Chao, Secretary, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Center for Auto Safety v. Elizabeth H. Dole, Secretary, Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- State of Alaska v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Trans Alaska Pipeline System (Taps Carriers), Petro Star Inc., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Mid Louisiana Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- OXY USA, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.