Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Continental Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1878PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to Genesee. Assumpsit. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

The company sued in assumpsit to recover back of plaintiffs in error nearly $4000 paid them in February, 1873, upon their claim of loss under a policy of insurance the company had previously made to them on a dwelling house and personal effects contained in it. The declaration consisted of the common counts, and of a special count containing some explanation of the cause of action. The general issue being pleaded, the cause was tried before a jury who found for the company for the amount which had been paid with interest. Judgment was then entered by the court and the plaintiffs in error now…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Monaghan v. Agricultural Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Watkins v. Mountain Home Co-operative Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Angell v. LoomisMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Ijames v. Republic Insurance Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Harty v. TeaganMichigan Supreme Court · 1907

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API