Legal Opinion

Rockhill Iron & Coal Co. v. City of Taunton

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided May 12, 1921No. 1458PublishedCited by 8 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts; James M. Morton, Judge. Action by the Rockhill Iron & Coal Company against the City of Taunton. Judgment for defendant (261 Fed. 234), and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

BINGHAM, Circuit Judge.

This is an action brought by the Rock-hill i ron & Coal Company, a Pennsylvania corporation, against the city of Taunton, a Massachusetts municipal corporation, for breach of contract.

The plaintiff’s business consists in mining coal in Pennsylvania and shipping it to purchasers in the different states. The defendant corporation was authorized (Acts of Massachusetts 1905, c. 410, § 3) to maintain and operate a plant for manufacturing and distributing electricity for the benefit of its inhabitants. The provisions of the above act, so far as material to this case, read as…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Illinois Trust & Savings Bank v. City of Arkansas CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
  3. Hinckley v. Pittsburgh Bessemer Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. United States v. Purcell Envelope Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. Hamilton v. . McPhersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1863

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. OliverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  2. Jacobberger v. School District No. 1Oregon Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Municipal Light Commission of Taunton v. City of TauntonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  4. Duggan v. City of TauntonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  5. Doyle v. McBee.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API