Legal Opinion

Duggan v. City of Taunton

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 16, 1971PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCutter, J.

Mr. Duggan and Mr. Phillipe (fn. 2), each an attorney, brought separate actions of contract against the city and Taunton Municipal Light .Plant Commission (commission) and others (fn. 1) to recover amounts allegedly .owed them for legal services to the commission under written contracts, each dated December 14, 1965, in the form described in the margin. 3 A demurrer to each declaration by the commission and its members and manager was overruled subject to the commission’s exceptions. At trial, a stipulation of certain facts was filed. These facts we summarize below. Certain evidence about…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Tenney v. . BergerNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. Denio v. City of Huntington BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. McInerney v. Massasoit Greyhound Association, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  4. Board of Commissioners v. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Zuckernik v. Jordan Marsh Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Malonis v. HarringtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  2. Salem Realty Co. v. MateraMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  3. Labor Relations Comm. v. Bd. of Selectmen of DracutMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  4. Charles River Park, Inc. v. Boston Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1990
  5. Mayor of Salem v. Warner Amex Cable Communications Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API