Doyle v. McBee.

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Moore.

Plaintiffs in error will be referred to as the Doyles, and defendants in error as the McBees, the Larsons, or the district.

The Doyles brought the action against the McBees, the Larsons, and the district, asserting three claims: one for rescission of a contract for the purchase of property; one for damages flowing from a breach of covenant of seisin; and a third claim against the district for damages allegedly sustained because of the failure of the district to place of record the instrument by which it acquired an easement over the property described in the…