Legal Opinion

FiTeq Inc. v. Venture Corp.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 14, 2016No. Case No. 13-cv-01946-BLFPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

[Re: ECF 313]

BETH LABSON FREEMAN, United States District Judge

Though now almost unbelievable, this case began with a partnership between the parties to build a groundbreaking payment card that would combat fraud. FiTeq and Venture entered into an Operating Agreement (“OA”), pursuant to which each party had responsibilities: FiTeq was to design, develop, market, and sell the card, while Venture was to “seamlessfly] manufacture” it. ECF 199-26, OA Recitals. The agreement was highly sequenced, with ten…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. In Re Oracle Corp. Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. In Re Tobacco II CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Darnaa, LLC v. Google Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API