FiTeq Inc. v. Venture Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
[Re: ECF 313]
BETH LABSON FREEMAN, United States District Judge
Though now almost unbelievable, this case began with a partnership between the parties to build a groundbreaking payment card that would combat fraud. FiTeq and Venture entered into an Operating Agreement (“OA”), pursuant to which each party had responsibilities: FiTeq was to design, develop, market, and sell the card, while Venture was to “seamlessfly] manufacture” it. ECF 199-26, OA Recitals. The agreement was highly sequenced, with ten…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- In Re Oracle Corp. Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- In Re Tobacco II CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Darnaa, LLC v. Google Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2017