Darnaa, LLC v. Google Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS
William Alsup, United States District Judge
INTRODUCTION
In this action claiming breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, defendants move to dismiss the second *1118amended complaint. For the reasons stated below, the motion is Granted.
STATEMENT
At all relevant times, defendant YouTube, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of defendant Google Inc., operated an Internet service, also called YouTube, on which users could view and distribute digital videos. YouTube, LLC, required users seeking to distribute videos on the YouTube service to “electronically agree…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- McDonald v. Antelope Valley Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- United States v. MarolfCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Kolani v. GluskaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Food Safety Net Services v. Eco Safe Systems USA, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Byron Estrada v. Real Time Resolutions Inc., et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
- Eric Rahman v. Google LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025
- Neeraj Chauhan v. Google LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023