Legal Opinion

Coyle v. Furtak

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided May 7, 1993No. 3106Published

1Opinion of the Court

WILSON, J.,

OPINION

This case comes before the Superior Court on appellant/plaintiff’s appeal of the trial court’s order of January 22,1993, denying appellant’s motion for post-trial relief.

During the summer of 1987, plaintiff Barbara Coyle became interested in the beauty salon business. After brief discussions with the defendant Doris Furtak, plaintiff began work at the defendant’s beauty shop, the Vanity Villa Beauty Salon, which is located at 6817 Torresdale Avenue, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Plaintiff worked at defendant’s salon, without pay, for approximately three months to leam about…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Delahanty v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. United States v. Franklin Delano JoanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  3. Aiken Industries, Inc. v. Estate of WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Pollock v. MorelliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Eastern Dental Corp. v. Isaac Masel Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API