Legal Opinion
United States v. Franklin Delano Joan
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 25, 1989No. 88-3857PublishedCited by 115 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GILMORE, District Judge:
The issue in this case is whether the sentencing judge’s upward departure from the Sentencing Guidelines was justified. We find that it was, and affirm.
I
On February 18, 1988, a Grand Jury for the Southern District of Ohio at Columbus returned a ten-count indictment against Franklin Delano Joan, Gary Cabbie Willis, and Gayle Cordell. Count 1 charged the appellant with conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana; Count 2 charged possession with intent to distribute marijuana; Counts 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 charged that, on several dates, Appellant used a telephone…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Wilfredo Diaz-VillafaneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Juventino Mejia-OroscoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Ryan, JeremiahCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Humberto CervantesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by115 opinions
- United States v. Jose Jesus Lira-BarrazaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Lawrence Douglas Todd, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Gilberto Ocasio, A/K/A Gilberto Ocasio AgostoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Herrera-ZunigaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Jeffrey Wayne DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.