Legal Opinion

Scarlett v. Hopper

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 8, 1992No. 89-CV-0344-ST; CA A66727PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Plaintiffs in this declaratory judgment action are the daughters and a grandson of the decedent and are beneficiaries under her will. Defendant was the decedent’s husband and is the personal representative of her estate. The controversy is over the meaning of the decedent’s and defendant’s “joint, mutual and reciprocal will.” Article three of the will makes certain specific bequests, and then provides:

“All the rest, residue and remainder of my estate of any kind and of any nature whatsoever I give, devise and bequeath to my beloved husband, JOHN A. HOPPER.”

Article five of the will provides…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McDermid v. BourhillOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Hartman v. PendletonOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  3. LaGrand v. LaGrandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. United States National Bank v. DanielsOregon Supreme Court · 1946

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. First Interstate Bank of Oregon, N.A. v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. Kidder v. OlsenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. Webb v. UnderhillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API