Legal Opinion

Webb v. Underhill

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 28, 1994No. 91-4954-C; CA A77449PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, P. J.

In this action to partition real property, ORS 105.205, plaintiffs appeal from a summary judgment for defendant. We hold that the determinative issue in the case, whether the alternative beneficiaries’ remainder interests are contingent or vested, is a question of law that is amenable to resolution on summary judgment, and that the trial court correctly held that those interests are contingent. Accordingly, we affirm.

Ernest Webb, owner of the Buck Hollow Ranch, died in 1972. His will devises all of his property to his wife Agnes for fife, or until she remarries, with the remainder of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pedro v. JanuaryOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Love v. LindstedtOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Morse v. PaulsonOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Jones v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Gerrish v. HinmanOregon Supreme Court · 1880

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Temple Beth Israel v. FeissCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. Temple Beth Israel v. FeissCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API