Legal Opinion

Young v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 10, 1934PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On 5 November, 1931, about 1:30 p.m., on a clear day the deceased, an old man eighty-eight years of age, undertook to cross the defendant's tracks near Canton. He approached the track on the south side and was walking in a footpath across said track. The roadbed was on a fill eight or twelve feet in height and the path led up to the track. From the west to the point of collision is a steep grade. An eye witness offered by plaintiff said: "He came across from the south side and walked upon the bank. As he got upon the top of the railroad fill he turned and walked with his back to the train…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tart Ex Rel. Tart v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  2. Holton v. Kinston-Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. Pope v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  4. Davidson v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  5. Bailey v. Black Mountain Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wagoner v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Rimmer v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  3. Boykin v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  4. Johnson v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. Coley v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API