Legal Opinion

Perkins v. Desipio

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 2, 1999PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORIE MELVIN, J.:

¶ 1 Appellants, Karen Perkins and James Perkins, appeal from the judgment entered on the verdict in favor of Appellee, Robert Desipio, D.D.S., in this dental malpractice action following the trial court’s denial of their motion for post trial relief. The Appellants challenge the trial court’s refusal to submit their informed consent cause of action to the jury. For the following reasons we reverse.

¶2 On Thursday, July 30, 1992 while vacationing in Ocean City, Maryland Mrs. Perkins developed a toothache in an upper front tooth. She contacted her mother who then arranged an…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Moure v. RaeuchleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Gouse v. CasselSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Childers v. Power Line Equipment Rentals, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Sinclair by Sinclair v. BlockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Sagala v. TavaresSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Armbruster v. HorowitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Valles v. Albert Einstein Medical CenterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Lear, Inc. v. EddySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Geschwindt v. WagnerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Tom Clark Chevrolet, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Department of Environmental ProtectionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API