Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Hampton

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 23, 1981No. Crim. 20756PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCOTT, J.

Richard Hampton and his codefendant Eugene Lewis Pinchback were convicted of violation of Penal Code section 261, subdivision 3 (rape by threats of force). Pinchback was additionally convicted of violation of Penal Code section 288 a, subdivision (c) (unlawful oral copulation). The sole issue on appeal is whether the court erred in failing to instruct sua sponte on the defense of a reasonable and good faith belief that consent had been given to the sexual acts. (People v. Mayberry (1975) 15 Cal.3d 143 [125 Cal.Rptr. 745, 542 P.2d 1337].)

On May 2, 1979, while riding in an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. SedenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. People v. FlannelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. People v. MayberryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. People v. ModestoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. People v. SageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. People v. GonzalezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. People v. GuthrieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. People v. BurnhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. People v. RiveraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API