Legal Opinion

In Re Relafen Antitrust Litigation

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided February 22, 2005No. Master File 01-12239-WGYPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM CLARIFYING THE PRESENT STATUS OF THESE PROCEEDINGS AND SETTING FORTH THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR FURTHER JUDICIAL ACTION

YOUNG, Chief Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This case is a consolidated action against SmithKline Beeeham Corporation and GlaxoSmithKline PLC (collectively “Smith-Kline”) by multiple parties. The plaintiffs include SmithKline competitor Eon Labs; pharmaceutical wholesalers that purchased Relafen directly from SmithKline (“direct purchasers”); drugstores that indirectly purchased Relafen and the generic drug nabumetone for resale (“drugstore plaintiffs”); and…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re Relafen Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
  2. In Re Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005
  3. In Re Flonase Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Apple, Inc. v. Motorola Mobility, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2012
  5. In re Nexium (Esomeprazole) Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API