In Re Relafen Antitrust Litigation
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM CLARIFYING THE PRESENT STATUS OF THESE PROCEEDINGS AND SETTING FORTH THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR FURTHER JUDICIAL ACTION
YOUNG, Chief Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This case is a consolidated action against SmithKline Beeeham Corporation and GlaxoSmithKline PLC (collectively “Smith-Kline”) by multiple parties. The plaintiffs include SmithKline competitor Eon Labs; pharmaceutical wholesalers that purchased Relafen directly from SmithKline (“direct purchasers”); drugstores that indirectly purchased Relafen and the generic drug nabumetone for resale (“drugstore plaintiffs”); and…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re Relafen Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
- In Re Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005
- In Re Flonase Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Apple, Inc. v. Motorola Mobility, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2012
- In re Nexium (Esomeprazole) Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.