Legal Opinion
In Re Flonase Antitrust Litigation
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 2, 2011No. Civil Action Nos. 08-3149, 08-3301, 09-1638PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
795 F.Supp.2d 300 (2011)
In re FLONASE ANTITRUST LITIGATION.
This Document Relates to: All Actions
Roxane Laboratories, Inc., Plaintiff,
v.
Smithkline Beecham Corporation d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline, Defendant.
Civil Action Nos. 08-3149, 08-3301, 09-1638.
United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.
June 2, 2011.
Bruce L. Simon, Jonathan M. Watkins, Pearson, Simon, Warshaw & Penny, LLP, San Francisco, CA, Clifford H. Pearson, Pearson, Simon, Warshaw, Penny, LLP, Sherman Oaks, CA, Steven A. Asher, Mindee J. Reuben, Weinstein, Kitchenoff & Asher, LLC, Philadelphia, PA, for Plaintiff.
Leslie E. John,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- In re Suboxone (Buprenorphine Hydrochloride & Naloxone) Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- In re EpipenDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2018
- Tyco Healthcare Group LP v. Mutual Pharmaceutical Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Trustees of University of Pennsylvania v. St. Jude Children's Research HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- In re Flonase Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.