Legal Opinion

State v. Ellingson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 11, 1969No. 41237PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nelson, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction for the crime of aggravated robbery after a trial by jury.

The principal assignment of error is that there was insufficient evidence to convince a jury beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant, Rodney Ellingson, was guilty of aggravated robbery.

It appears from the record that on May 16, 1967, at about 11:55 a. m., Arnold Shapiro was working in the Falls Hardware Store in Minneapolis when a man he later identified as the defendant came in from the left front door and asked for an electric drill. After showing defendant the drill…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. State v. SuttonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  4. State v. SchabertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  5. State v. FarmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. State v. DanielsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. State v. TurnipseedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. State v. FloresSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  5. Fields v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API