Legal Opinion
Bermont Operating Co. v. City of New York
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided May 22, 1985PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Final judgment entered October 22, 1984 affirmed, with $10 costs.
This case presents the question whether a Board of Estimate resolution is required for the exercise of a renewal option for space leased to the City of New York by petitioner landlord. The original lease and a subsequent modification were approved by resolutions of the Board. Pursuant to the resolution authorizing the modification of the original lease, the term was extended for a period of 10 years, to expire March 3,1979, at an annual rental of $227,898. The modified lease, as authorized by the Board, *654contai…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Maidgold Associates v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- 120 Bay Street Realty Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Bermont Operating Corp. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- 120 Bay Street Realty Corp. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Bermont Operating Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
4Cited by2 opinions
- 2641 Concourse Co. v. City University of New YorkNew York Court of Claims · 1987
- Rowe v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1994