Legal Opinion
Maidgold Associates v. City of New York
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 30, 1985PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
In these two cases, which arise out of the same facts, the respective orders of the Appellate Division appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.
In May 1979, plaintiff Maidgold Associates (Maidgold), a tenant at 75 Maiden Lane, New York City, entered into negotiations with defendant City of New York (City), which was represented by Alex Liberman, to sublease the seventh, eighth and ninth floors at 75 Maiden Lane to the City. On August 16,1979, the Board of Estimate, by resolution, authorized the City to sublease the space “for use by the Mayor’s Office of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Moore v. . MayorNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Lindlots Realty Corp. v. County of SuffolkNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Pauk v. Board of Higher EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Oswego Falls Corp. v. City of FultonNew York Supreme Court · 1933
- Oswego Falls Corp. v. City of FultonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
3Cited by7 opinions
- 2641 Concourse Co. v. City University of New YorkNew York Court of Claims · 1987
- Vlachos v. New York City Loft BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Gladsky v. City of Glen CoveAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Bermont Operating Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1985
- Fatone v. City of TroyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.