Legal Opinion
Rowe v. City of New York
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 25, 1994PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*685OPINION OF THE COURT
Herman Cahn, J.
In this CPLR article 78 proceeding, the court is presented with an issue of first impression: Is the "fair share” analysis requirement provided in the new New York City Charter § 203 retroactive to leases approved by the Board of Estimate under the old New York City Charter when the lease is amended after the new New York City Charter has become effective?
The following facts are undisputed:
A building located at 88 Third Avenue in the Boerum Hill area of Brooklyn, New York, was selected by New York City as the site of a facility for respondent Human Resources…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Save the Pine Bush, Inc. v. City of AlbanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- De Milio v. BorghardNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Austin v. Board of Higher EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Central School District No. 2 of Towns of Coeymans v. New York State Teachers' Retirement SystemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
- Ahern v. Board of SupervisorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Waters v. DennisonNew York Supreme Court · 2007