Legal Opinion

Liles v. Creveling

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1924PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Green

The original bill herein was filed by Liles and other citizens of Cheatham county, residing’ near Kingston Springs, to enjoin the defendant, State highway commissioner, from locating and building the road called the Memphis to Bristol highway, in its course through Cheatham county, over what is known as the Dog Creek route, and to compel said commissioner to locate said highway through Cheatham county over what is known as the Kingston Springs route. J. T. Henry and other citizens of Cheatham county, over whose land the Dog Creek route passes were allowed to file a petition in the cause, and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. STATE OF MINNESOTA Ex Rel. THE CITY OF DULUTHSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. State Highway Department v. Montgomery Mitchell's HeirsTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
  3. State ex rel. Bell v. CummingsTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Dyer County v. RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1889
  5. City of Chattanooga v. Southern Railway Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Moulton v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Berry v. HayesTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Johnson Freight Lines, Inc. v. DavisTennessee Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Jackson County v. McGlassonTennessee Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Marshall v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API