Legal Opinion

Berry v. Hayes

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1930PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

The constitutionality of Chapter 45, Private Acts of 1923, is involved. That act provided “that the State Highway Commission shall not have the right or power to impose expenses upon” Williamson County, designated by population, “without the consent of such County. ’ ’ In exercise of the power conferred by the General Highway Acts, Chapter 74, Acts of 1917, and Chapter 149, Acts of 1919, providing for a “system of State Highways” and expressly empowering the Highway Department to designate all such roadways and to prose cute condemnation proceedings, and requiring all counties alike to pay…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  2. State Highway Department v. Montgomery Mitchell's HeirsTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. GambillTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Roberts v. Roane CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Fleming v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Donathan v. McMinn CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Town of McMinnville v. CurtisTennessee Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Baker v. Hickman CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Brentwood Liquors Corp. of Williamson Cty. v. FoxTennessee Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Gallien v. MillerTennessee Supreme Court · 1936

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API