Tate v. Eli Lilly & Co.
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
WISEMAN, District Judge.
This is a diversity case in which plaintiff seeks to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly resulting from her in útero exposure to the drug diethylstilbestrol, commonly known as “DES.” Defendant Merck & Co., Inc., has filed a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss the complaint. It maintains that the ten-year “cap” on products liability cases contained in section 3 of the Tennessee Products Liability Act of 1978 [the Act], codified at T.C.A. § 29-28-103(a) (1980), bars plaintiff’s right of action. Plaintiff argues that the ten-year cap is inapplicable…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Teeters v. CurreyTennessee Supreme Court · 1974
- McCroskey v. Bryant Air Conditioning CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
- Shousha v. Matthews Drivurself Service, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1962
- Morris v. GrossTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
- Parlato Ex Rel. Parlato v. HoweDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mark Wayne v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Jennifer Kay Brumit Mathis and Her Husband, Barry L. Mathis, Plaintiffs v. Eli Lilly and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Holt v. Hypro, A Division of Lear Siegler, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Jennifer Amanda Holt v. HyproCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984