Legal Opinion

Holt v. Hypro, A Division of Lear Siegler, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 22, 1984No. 83-5423PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRITT, Circuit Judge.

In this Tennessee diversity case, the question is whether a minor must bring her products liability action “within ten years from the date on which the product was first purchased” or within one year after adulthood. The applicable limitations statute, T.C.A. § 29-28-103(a) reads in pertinent part:

Any action against a manufacturer or seller of a product for injury to person or property caused by its defective or unreasonably dangerous condition must be brought ... within six years of the date of injury, in any event [sic], the action must be brought within ten years…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tate v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Desiano v. Warner-Lambert & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  2. Jennifer Amanda Holt v. HyproCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API