Legal Opinion

Fells v. Brooks

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 10, 1981No. Civ. A. 80-2981PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOHN H. PRATT, District Judge.

This is a motion for attorney’s fees arising out of an action settled by stipulation. The action challenged arrangements made by the District of Columbia for the education of two physically handicapped, mentally retarded children living at the Forest Haven Home, the District’s primary institution for the mentally retarded. In particular, plaintiffs, who are surrogate parents of the two children, alleged that the District’s failure to provide adequate transportation from Laurel, Maryland, where Forest Haven is located, to the children’s special…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Southeastern Community College v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  5. George A. Lloyd and Janet B. Wolfe, Etc. v. The Regional Transportation Authority and the Chicago Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Doe v. Southeastern UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1990
  2. Patsel v. District of Columbia Board of EducationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1982
  3. Daniels v. BarryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1987
  4. Davis v. District of Columbia Board of EducationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API